The Gay Parents Study

Slate may be a strange venue for a public ?peer review? process, but I am willing. The New Family Structures Study (NFSS) was not conceived of in the dark, nor do I have anything to hide. The data are high quality, and yes, a good investment. It?s information, albeit sensitive stuff. At the beginning of the project, I committed to pulling together a group of consultants from left and right, and I did that. Indeed, at the outset I invited several of the authors of important earlier studies on the children of same-sex households, as well as a demographer from the Williams Institute, to be a part of the genesis of the research and survey design process, but they declined. Other quality family scholars?all of whom lean left?took their place. Don?t you think if this were a right-wing conspiracy, it would be headed by someone who?s more savvy, political, one-sided, and predictable than I am? There is no conspiracy here, just a piece of contested social science from a study funded by a pair of organizations many of your readers distrust. Critics are disputing the meaning of the study?a meaning I have not assigned to it?as well as the very nerve to have conducted it in the first place. But I?m glad you?ve seen value in it.

steve smith zou bisou bisou tim tebow press conference tebow press conference trina andy roddick rob dyrdek